Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, rollback
19,320
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: − + − ::''This section requires expansion''+
→Effects on Conservapedia: explained basic idea
On April 7, 2010, a federal appeals court ruled that the FCC did not have the power to regulate this issue. Congress still retains the right to regulate net neutrality and/or delegate additional powers to the FCC.<ref>http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/court-rules-against-fccs-comcast-net-neutrality-decision-634</ref>
On April 7, 2010, a federal appeals court ruled that the FCC did not have the power to regulate this issue. Congress still retains the right to regulate net neutrality and/or delegate additional powers to the FCC.<ref>http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/court-rules-against-fccs-comcast-net-neutrality-decision-634</ref>
==Effects on Conservapedia==
==Effects on conservative websites including Conservapedia==
If not prohibited, better Internet service would be given to those websites and companies with pay more. Large corporations like CNN and ABC would be able to pay these rates, and thus become much more technologically reliable. Smaller websites, especially non-profit ones, would generally be unable to pay the increased rates. There websites would therefore become harder and slower to access, and many users could be turned away as a result. Internet traffic would eventually flow towards the better funded websites, and away from non-profit sites such as Conservapedia.
==References==
==References==