Difference between revisions of "Talk:Systematic English"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Not sure I get it)
(i am trying)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:Interesting, but I don't quite understand.  How does this relate directly to Google translate? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 17:43, 2 December 2016 (EST)
 
:Interesting, but I don't quite understand.  How does this relate directly to Google translate? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</small></sup> 17:43, 2 December 2016 (EST)
 +
 +
::I am 55 years old. I am well-educated. I am an inexperienced {{lw|writer|}}. I did a failure-analysis on my first attempt to translate my calculus page to French and German. Systematic English is the result of my best guesses as to why French- and German-speaking people told me that the translations about my calculus page through GT were bad.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 03:15, 3 December 2016 (EST)

Latest revision as of 08:15, December 3, 2016

Purpose of this new subset dialect of English

I designed this language in part because I would like to use Translate Google Translate and have it perform well.--Amorrow (talk) 17:32, 2 December 2016 (EST)

Interesting, but I don't quite understand. How does this relate directly to Google translate? --David B (TALK) 17:43, 2 December 2016 (EST)
I am 55 years old. I am well-educated. I am an inexperienced writer. I did a failure-analysis on my first attempt to translate my calculus page to French and German. Systematic English is the result of my best guesses as to why French- and German-speaking people told me that the translations about my calculus page through GT were bad.--Amorrow (talk) 03:15, 3 December 2016 (EST)