Difference between revisions of "Natural logarithm"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
(Note error in image)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Image:log.png|thumb|right|px=200|red: natural logarithm]]
+
[[Image:log.png|thumb|right|px=200|red: natural logarithm. Note that the legend is in error in that it confuses the base 2 and base e lines.]]
 
The '''natural logarithm''', <math>\ln(x)</math> is the inverse of the function <math>e^x</math>. In other words, if <math>y = e^x</math>, we define <math>\ln(y) = x</math>.
 
The '''natural logarithm''', <math>\ln(x)</math> is the inverse of the function <math>e^x</math>. In other words, if <math>y = e^x</math>, we define <math>\ln(y) = x</math>.
  

Revision as of 23:23, January 27, 2017

red: natural logarithm. Note that the legend is in error in that it confuses the base 2 and base e lines.

The natural logarithm, is the inverse of the function . In other words, if , we define .

The natural logarithm has some interesting properties that follow from the multiplicative properties of . The natural logarithm is also particularly useful in calculating interest.

Properties of the Logarithm

  • for all positive reals .


Proof: If , we can write and . It follows that . By definition, . This last expression, of course, is .



Proof: If is a positive integer, this just follows from repeated application of the above-mentioned additive property of the logarithm. For , note that the statement follows by observing that . Thus, for all rational numbers . The statement must therefore hold for all reals by continuity.



Proof: , whence we must have .