Changes

195 bytes added ,  02:39, February 12, 2017
Line 30: Line 30:  
#Refuses to admit the truth in debate, even if a conservative compromises in a conciliatory manner
 
#Refuses to admit the truth in debate, even if a conservative compromises in a conciliatory manner
 
#Resorts to bringing religion into a political discussion to use against a conservative opponent  when the liberal feels they are losing the argument.
 
#Resorts to bringing religion into a political discussion to use against a conservative opponent  when the liberal feels they are losing the argument.
−
#Like to use the phrase "reflects poorly on the site" when talking about the liberal articles on Conservapedia <ref>do a search on [[Special:Search|"reflects poorly"]]</ref>
+
#Like to use the phrase "reflects poorly on the site" when talking about the liberal articles on Conservapedia.<ref>do a search on [[Special:Search|"reflects poorly"]]</ref>
 
#Uses the term "controversial" to describe what he opposes (e.g., [[classroom prayer]]), but not to describe what he supports (e.g., [[theory of evolution]])
 
#Uses the term "controversial" to describe what he opposes (e.g., [[classroom prayer]]), but not to describe what he supports (e.g., [[theory of evolution]])
−
#A lack of originality and a predominance of copying and imitating
+
#A lack of originality and a predominance of copying and imitating.
−
#Like to use the phrase "Silence Speaks Volumes" <ref>
+
#Likes to use the phrase "Silence Speaks Volumes".<ref>
 
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/28/us/28vigil.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/U/Urbina,%20Ian New York Times - When silence speak volumes - example]  
 
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/28/us/28vigil.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/U/Urbina,%20Ian New York Times - When silence speak volumes - example]  
 
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-lois-capps/when-silence-speaks-volum_b_98601.html When silence speaks volumes], Huffington Post  
 
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-lois-capps/when-silence-speaks-volum_b_98601.html When silence speaks volumes], Huffington Post  
 
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/sen-mitch-mcconnell-his_b_38699.html Another Huffington Post example of When silence speaks volumes]</ref>  
 
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/sen-mitch-mcconnell-his_b_38699.html Another Huffington Post example of When silence speaks volumes]</ref>  
−
#Call something disliked a "conspiracy theory," but don't use that term against wacky liberal theories like [[global warming]]
+
#Calls something disliked a "conspiracy theory," but don't use that term against wacky liberal theories like "[[global warming]]".
−
#Respond with "sigh" when presented with repeated examples of harm caused by liberal culture, yet persist in denying the harm despite overwhelming evidence
+
#Responds with "sigh" when presented with repeated examples of harm caused by liberal culture, yet persist in denying the harm despite overwhelming evidence.
 +
#Uses [[condescension]] against a conservative opponent to belittle the conservative and his viewpoints and to avoid addressing a subject for which the liberal has no logical response.
 
#Declaring that one is insulted as a response to an argument<ref>"One of [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]'s most prominent black supporters [Bob Johnson] said Sunday ''he'' was insulted by the characterization by rival [[Barack Obama]]'s presidential campaign of ''her'' remarks about the civil rights movement."  [http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/johnson_obama_bet/2008/01/13/64032.html]</ref>
 
#Declaring that one is insulted as a response to an argument<ref>"One of [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]'s most prominent black supporters [Bob Johnson] said Sunday ''he'' was insulted by the characterization by rival [[Barack Obama]]'s presidential campaign of ''her'' remarks about the civil rights movement."  [http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/johnson_obama_bet/2008/01/13/64032.html]</ref>
−
#Insistence on talking more and having the last word in a discussion or debate, or [[last wordism]]
+
#Insistence on talking more and having the last word in a discussion or debate, or [[last wordism]].
−
#Over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy <ref>[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24193 God and the Presidential Election], [[Bill O'Reilly]], [[Human Events]], December 29, 2007</ref>
+
#Over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy.<ref>[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24193 God and the Presidential Election], [[Bill O'Reilly]], [[Human Events]], December 29, 2007</ref>
 
#Over-reliance on [[mockery]],<ref>Your use of the first amendment sounds like [[liberal logic]]. Careful, you're on thin ice trying to utilize that amendment. The only amendment that counts is the second. For the rest of the Constitution, just refer to the Ten Commandments for everything you need to know. --[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 14:18, 20 February 2008 (EST) [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=prev&oldid=391932]</ref><ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[Talk:Main Page/archive23#Burma|User:Graham 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT)]]</ref><ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
 
#Over-reliance on [[mockery]],<ref>Your use of the first amendment sounds like [[liberal logic]]. Careful, you're on thin ice trying to utilize that amendment. The only amendment that counts is the second. For the rest of the Constitution, just refer to the Ten Commandments for everything you need to know. --[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 14:18, 20 February 2008 (EST) [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=prev&oldid=391932]</ref><ref>"adolescent berating of Liberals" [[Talk:Main Page/archive23#Burma|User:Graham 07:47, 23 September 2007 (EDT)]]</ref><ref>"I would appreciate a little less paranoia'' [[User:Graham|Graham]] 09:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298366&oldid=298314#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref><ref>"IN fact, this should be regarded as 'idiot's style'" Graham 08:26, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&curid=45295&diff=298366&oldid=298314#.22General_Betray_Us.22]</ref><ref>"IN fact, this should be regarded as 'idiot's style'" Graham 08:26, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_liberal_bias#Its_just_funny]</ref><ref>"The toilets overflowed at school today...if only the [[liberal]]s had allowed religion in school, this never would have happened." BillOhannity on October 1, 2007</ref> even resorting to outright abuse when mockery fails
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Template_talk:Examples_of_liberal_bias#Its_just_funny]</ref><ref>"The toilets overflowed at school today...if only the [[liberal]]s had allowed religion in school, this never would have happened." BillOhannity on October 1, 2007</ref> even resorting to outright abuse when mockery fails
−
#Using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that liberals over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that liberals do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
+
#Uses non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that liberals over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that liberals do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
−
#Draw an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical
+
#Draws an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical.
 
#Deleting a comment, and with it the entire comment thread stemming from it, in an online article's comment section in an attempt to save face if the liberal realizes they have lost an argument they had with a conservative on that thread.
 
#Deleting a comment, and with it the entire comment thread stemming from it, in an online article's comment section in an attempt to save face if the liberal realizes they have lost an argument they had with a conservative on that thread.
  
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846

edits