Changes

==The doctrine of the Last Laugh==

==The doctrine of the Last Laugh==

The progressively revealed Doctine of the Last Laugh, I find first prophesied in Psalm 2:4 " He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision" From this verse, I wish, out of politeness, only to ephasize the first phrase , He that sits in the heavens shall laugh. As applied to Professor ______ 's lecture, I firmly believe, though adherence to this belief is not required for salvation, that at the end of the day, there just might be, and I express this from something more than just a hunch, a deep laughter that shall roll around the earth, the vindicating laughter of God, whithering all the mythologists of the world, as up from the ground, at the Last Day known as the Day of Resurrection, shall stand once again, a man, a single man (perhaps his wife with him), the First Man...let us give a name to him - Adam.

The progressively revealed Doctrine of the Last Laugh, I find first prophesied in Psalm 2:4 " He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision" From this verse, I wish, out of politeness, only to ephasize the first phrase, He that sits in the heavens shall laugh. As applied to Professor ______ 's lecture, I firmly believe, though adherence to this belief is not required for salvation, that at the end of the day, there just might be, and I express this from something more than just a hunch, a deep laughter that shall roll around the earth, the vindicating laughter of God, whithering all the mythologists of the world, as up from the ground, at the Last Day known as the Day of Resurrection, shall stand once again, a man, a single man (perhaps his wife with him), the First Man...let us give a name to him - Adam.

I find the theological basis of the Doctrine of the Last Laugh further explicated in 1 Corinthians 1:7,

I find the theological basis of the Doctrine of the Last Laugh further explicated in 1 Corinthians 1:7,

Why not? Why could it not have been? Why could not the First Adam, "Adam", have been as real, and concrete and singular- all after his kind and order- as was the Second Adam (in Whom we have believed and into Whose body we were baptized), Jesus Christ, after His kind and order? All it takes is a little imagination.

Why not? Why could it not have been? Why could not the First Adam, "Adam", have been as real, and concrete and singular- all after his kind and order- as was the Second Adam (in Whom we have believed and into Whose body we were baptized), Jesus Christ, after His kind and order? All it takes is a little imagination.

==See Also==

==See also==

*[[Talk:Conservative Bible Project]]

*[[Talk:Conservative Bible Project]]

*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]

*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]