Modern researchers have analyzed Mendel's results and have found that in many cases Mendel's results are improbably accurate (i.e., experimental results are seldom exact in their confirmation of an hypothesis, as Mendel's results appear to be). Rather than accusing Mendel of research fraud, which remains a possibility, some note that this is a case of "confirmation bias" (the expectation of certain results in an experiment leads the researcher to interpret results with that bias, rather than objectively report the results). | Modern researchers have analyzed Mendel's results and have found that in many cases Mendel's results are improbably accurate (i.e., experimental results are seldom exact in their confirmation of an hypothesis, as Mendel's results appear to be). Rather than accusing Mendel of research fraud, which remains a possibility, some note that this is a case of "confirmation bias" (the expectation of certain results in an experiment leads the researcher to interpret results with that bias, rather than objectively report the results). |