Changes

Line 41: Line 41:  
Isn't saying 'secular science' redundant? [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 17:33, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Isn't saying 'secular science' redundant? [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 17:33, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Absolutely not, given that (a) modern science owes its existence to a Christian worldview, and (b) not all scientists are secular.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:08, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Absolutely not, given that (a) modern science owes its existence to a Christian worldview, and (b) not all scientists are secular.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:08, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
::Regardless of a scientist's religious convictions, wouldn't all research be secular? How can you research the supernatural? [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 13:45, 29 April 2007 (EDT)