Changes

8 bytes removed ,  04:20, July 15, 2017
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
A law is  '''unconstitutional''' when it conflicts with the [[Constitution]] of that country. In the [[United States]], generally federal courts are responsible for determining whether a law conflicts with the [[United States Constitution]] with the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] being the final arbiter. Courts have had this power - called [[judicial review]] - since [[Marbury v. Madison]] although there is little explicit basis for the power in the Constitution itself.  
 
A law is  '''unconstitutional''' when it conflicts with the [[Constitution]] of that country. In the [[United States]], generally federal courts are responsible for determining whether a law conflicts with the [[United States Constitution]] with the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] being the final arbiter. Courts have had this power - called [[judicial review]] - since [[Marbury v. Madison]] although there is little explicit basis for the power in the Constitution itself.  
 
   
 
   
−
Beginning in the last half of the 20th century, courts started to declare laws unconstitutional based on reasons and cases not contained in the Constitution itself.{{fact}}
+
Beginning in the last half of the 20th century, courts started to declare laws unconstitutional based on reasons and cases not contained in the Constitution itself.
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,514

edits