Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte removed ,  22:13, July 28, 2017
m
Line 32: Line 32:  
== Creation Scientist Successfully Predicts Planetary Magnetic Fields ==
 
== Creation Scientist Successfully Predicts Planetary Magnetic Fields ==
 
Using a young earth creation model, physicist Russ Humphreys successfully predicted the strength of planetary magnetic fields while Darwinists failed <ref> The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields, by D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D., December 1984, CRSQ Vol. 21, No. 3[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/21/21_3/21_3.html]</ref>.  Since Humphreys' first success with the Voyager II results on Uranus and Neptune<ref>D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D. 1990. Beyond Neptune: Voyager II Supports Creation. Acts & Facts. 19 (5).[http://www.icr.org/article/beyond-neptune-voyager-ii-supports-creation]</ref>, subsequent explorations yielded additional successes for Mercury.<ref>Thomas, B. 2011. Mercury's Fading Magnetic Field Fits Creation Model. Acts & Facts.[http://www.icr.org/article/mercurys-fading-magnetic-field-fits]</ref>
 
Using a young earth creation model, physicist Russ Humphreys successfully predicted the strength of planetary magnetic fields while Darwinists failed <ref> The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields, by D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D., December 1984, CRSQ Vol. 21, No. 3[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/21/21_3/21_3.html]</ref>.  Since Humphreys' first success with the Voyager II results on Uranus and Neptune<ref>D. Russell Humphreys, Ph.D. 1990. Beyond Neptune: Voyager II Supports Creation. Acts & Facts. 19 (5).[http://www.icr.org/article/beyond-neptune-voyager-ii-supports-creation]</ref>, subsequent explorations yielded additional successes for Mercury.<ref>Thomas, B. 2011. Mercury's Fading Magnetic Field Fits Creation Model. Acts & Facts.[http://www.icr.org/article/mercurys-fading-magnetic-field-fits]</ref>
−
Dr. Donn Chapman invited Dr. Humphreys on the Origins TV series presenting his theory.<ref>Magnetic Fields, part 1 of 2 with Dr. D. Russell Humphreys - Origins[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7manZ1WF-Lc&list=PLT8IFvbAQauhBny_7LoWat_ZrjXx159Y7&index=26]</ref><ref>Magnetic Fields, part 2 of 2 with Dr. D. Russell Humphreys - Origins [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amDk5rgoThA&list=PLT8IFvbAQauhBny_7LoWat_ZrjXx159Y7&index=47]</ref>
+
Dr. Donn Chapman invited Dr. Humphreys on the Origins TV series presenting his theory.<ref>Magnetic Fields, part 1 of 2 with Dr. D. Russell Humphreys - Origins[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7manZ1WF-Lc&list=PLT8IFvbAQauhBny_7LoWat_ZrjXx159Y7&index=26]</ref><ref>Magnetic Fields, part 2 of 2 with Dr. D. Russell Humphreys - Origins[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amDk5rgoThA&list=PLT8IFvbAQauhBny_7LoWat_ZrjXx159Y7&index=47]</ref>
    
Other recent successful predictions were that Pluto would show active geology, it's atmospheric escape rate would be too great for millions of years, and that Pluto's moons would not yield evidence for being formed from collision.<ref>"Will Pluto Surprise Scientists?" by David F. Coppedge, ''Creation Evolution Headlines,''July 9, 2015 [https://crev.info/2015/07/will-pluto-surprise-scientists/]</ref>  This was confirmed by the New Horizons flyby.<ref>"“Overdose of Awesomeness”: New Pluto
 
Other recent successful predictions were that Pluto would show active geology, it's atmospheric escape rate would be too great for millions of years, and that Pluto's moons would not yield evidence for being formed from collision.<ref>"Will Pluto Surprise Scientists?" by David F. Coppedge, ''Creation Evolution Headlines,''July 9, 2015 [https://crev.info/2015/07/will-pluto-surprise-scientists/]</ref>  This was confirmed by the New Horizons flyby.<ref>"“Overdose of Awesomeness”: New Pluto
374

edits

Navigation menu