Talk:Communist Party of the United States of America

!

Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism. Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop.

This is all stolen content from [1]. It should be removed immediately. --BillOReillyFan 13:44, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Please review, it's not. It's all authored by me and another editor. RobS 13:56, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Are you absolutely sure? Did you apply it to teachersparadise.com?

I am reviewing there is a lot of material thats word for word from the site linked...Tmtoulouse 13:59, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

The second paragraph certainly looks identical to me. Dpbsmith 14:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Okay its a mixture of copy right and original from what I can tell, this needs to be gone over with a fine tooth comb. Tmtoulouse 14:00, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Agree. By the way, it's virtually certain that the original source is Wikipedia. [2] appears to be a Wikipedia "mirror," and probably is a slightly out-of-date version of the current WIkipedia article. Dpbsmith 14:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

All this is moot now since its been locked. --BillOReillyFan 14:03, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

It needs to be unlocked right away, it should NEVER have been locked to begin with. I left a message at RobS. Tmtoulouse 14:05, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

I have to site the CP violations on this page to be believed. Follow BillOReillyfan's link...the first two paragraphs are verbatim. I am not going through the rest right until its unlocked. Tmtoulouse 14:07, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

I seriously suggest page-blanking until resolution. It can be worked on in user sandboxes, and patched together later. --Hojimachong^talk 14:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

I attempted a redirect to communism but got smacked down and the page locked, I think most of it is probably original but we need to be careful. Tmtoulouse 14:15, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Wikipedia was invented so that the common man could change and edit pages to ensure there accuracy and authenticity. This website is complete rubbish, if to preserve the pages so they are aligned with your twisted world view you have to lock them then what is the point. You are a load of hard-headed persistant **

If name calling is, censorship & vandalism is what your comfortable with, perhaps you'd feel more at home at Wikipedia. RobS 12:29, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

There are sections in the first CP version which appear to have been written by at least the following Wikipedia editors: 24.27.58.16, Nobs01, Jiang, Nobs, 195.92.67.70, TDC, Fred_Bauder. I'm assuming Nobs and Nobs01 are the same person and am guessing that that's RobS, in which case it's mostly (but still not completely, I don't think) ok.

• 195.92.67.70: [3]
• 24.27.58.16: [4]
• Fred_Bauder: [5]
• Jiang: [6]
• Nobs01: [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
• Nobs: [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]
• TDC: [22] [23]

--Jtl 16:05, 5 May 2007 (EDT)