nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
→Loving v Virginia
My block just expired. I had planned to work on this article before I was blocked without cause. But, the last paragraph of Loving actually says "we could reach the same decision on substantive due process grounds." That's very important. You don't toss in lines in SC decisions without cause. Griswold then cites Loving, saying that it's proof that substantive due process didn't die out when Lochner did. Very relevant.-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 20:35, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
My block just expired. I had planned to work on this article before I was blocked without cause. But, the last paragraph of Loving actually says "we could reach the same decision on substantive due process grounds." That's very important. You don't toss in lines in SC decisions without cause. Griswold then cites Loving, saying that it's proof that substantive due process didn't die out when Lochner did. Very relevant.-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 20:35, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
*Coulda, woulda, shoulda, Bill Buck. But they didn't, did they? Your continued lies about being blocked for no reason is more than reason enough for me to block you. Please be productive, if you are indeed here to be so, and stop picking fights. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 20:58, 6 May 2007 (EDT)