Changes

Anthropological Revolution

1 byte added, 05:12, April 9, 2019
/* top */HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.scribd.com → https://www.scribd.com
This somewhat fuzzy umbrella philosophy presents revolutionary view on what brings happiness to humans in their intimate domains of family and sexual relationships, introduces new morals for human beings in their boundary moments of entering and departing the world and at bottom line it can be called the philosophy of the anthropological revolution.
This new philosophy, also based on [[moral relativism]] and policies stemming from it such as double-dealing, [[Machiavellianism]] and [[psychological manipulation]], has taken roots in modern Western Society and ostensibly reaps success in influencing the contemporary thinking. The traditional order and values are represented by [[Christianity]] that is henceforce implicitly assumed to be the main obstacle for modern liberalism and thus becomes the first-line enemy against which anthropological revolution leads undeclared war.{{#tag:ref|From this perspective, it is symptomatic that in October 2012 the European Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development (EPF), i.e. the network of mostly left-wing members of European national parliaments and the European Parliament compiled a ranking of Top 27 so called European Anti-choice Personalities. The First position was given to Slovak Christian democrat Anna Zaborska who openly opposes agenda on [[abortion]]s and [[euthanasia]] and maintains that ''"We have ended up in a situation when otherwise healthy older people see no reason why to live. I see this as a serious signal that the family ties between generations are crumbling."'' The 'enemies' were divided into several categories: Continental Catholic Mainstream Personalities, Catholic "Hard Right", Ecumenical: Northern Catholics, Protestants, Othodox and "Ultras"-Far Right, Traditionalist Catholic &TFP (Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property). When journalists approached ten members of the Forum with the question on what purpose the material should serve, member of the German Parliament Uwe Kekeritz distanced himself from the activities on grounds that he "personally rejects such methods and lists". Other members either were unable to respond or directed journalists to forum's official spokesman.<ref>{{cite web |title=Top 27 European Anti-choice Personalities |author=the European Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development (EPF)|date=October 2012 |url=httphttps://www.scribd.com/doc/114431296/Top-27-European-Anti-choice-Personalities-October-2012|accessdate=June 9, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Európski pro-choice poslanci zostavili rebríček protivníkov (Pro-choice Members of the European Parliament compiled a ranking of Enemies)|author=František Múčka|date=26.11.2012 13:03 | publisher=SME.sk (Petit Press)|url=http://www.sme.sk/c/6616772/europski-pro-choice-poslanci-zostavili-rebricek-protivnikov.html |accessdate=June 9, 2013|language=Slovak}}</ref>|group=note}} Some claim modern liberalism of anthropological revolution is nowadays countered by [[pro-life]] movement similarly to [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]]’s anti-communism standing on the other side of barricade against Marxism-Leninism during the [[Cold war]].<ref name="Lions">{{cite book
|author=Vladimír Palko
|title=Levy prichdzajú (Lions are coming)
Block, SkipCaptcha, bot, edit
57,719
edits