Difference between revisions of "User talk:Trooper"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(vandalism) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Vandalism here isn't any funnier than it is on Wikipedia. Either way its still juvenile and a waste of time. Also, the Colbert joke is so old at this point, if you are going to vandalize try to at least do something more original. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 02:43, 22 February 2007 (EST) | Vandalism here isn't any funnier than it is on Wikipedia. Either way its still juvenile and a waste of time. Also, the Colbert joke is so old at this point, if you are going to vandalize try to at least do something more original. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 02:43, 22 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Disagree== | ||
| + | People actually use Wikipedia for quick references, and reliabilty and accuracy are important. Vandalising Wikipedia is a shameful act. Nobody uses Conservapedia, however, except to laugh at and valdalize, so I feel that it's entirely appropriate.--[[User:Trooper|Trooper]] 03:01, 22 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:01, February 22, 2007
Vandalism here isn't any funnier than it is on Wikipedia. Either way its still juvenile and a waste of time. Also, the Colbert joke is so old at this point, if you are going to vandalize try to at least do something more original. JoshuaZ 02:43, 22 February 2007 (EST)
Disagree
People actually use Wikipedia for quick references, and reliabilty and accuracy are important. Vandalising Wikipedia is a shameful act. Nobody uses Conservapedia, however, except to laugh at and valdalize, so I feel that it's entirely appropriate.--Trooper 03:01, 22 February 2007 (EST)