Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,801
edits
Changes
→From User: Conservative to SamHB: My additional response to SamHB about more than one editor using the User: Conservative account
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:28, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:28, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
=== From User: Conservative to SamHB: My additional response to SamHB about more than one editor using the User: Conservative account ===
=== From User: Conservative to SamHB: My additional responses to SamHB about more than one editor using the User: Conservative account ===
The other admins at Conservapedia either agree with my decision to expand the editor base of the User: Conservative account or they tolerate it or they are ambivalent (I really haven't deeply queried them about this matter). After all is said and done, they see that Andy Schlafly is not making a big stink about it so they are ok with it.
The other admins at Conservapedia either agree with my decision to expand the editor base of the User: Conservative account or they tolerate it or they are ambivalent (I really haven't deeply queried them about this matter). After all is said and done, they see that Andy Schlafly is not making a big stink about it so they are ok with it.
As far as Andy Schlafly goes, he knows there are more than one editor of the User: Conservative account and he tolerates it. He is not excited about it despite the fact that account could potentially remain active upon my demise. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:39, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
As far as Andy Schlafly goes, he knows there are more than one editor of the User: Conservative account and he tolerates it. He is not excited about it despite the fact that account could potentially remain active upon my demise. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:39, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
:Here is an excerpt from an email I sent other admins on Jun 30, 2018, 9:02 AM: "Given that another editor of my User: Conservative account unblocked him, I think he was hoping would be unblocked again. That is not going to happen."[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:50, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
:Here is an excerpt from an email I sent other admins on Jun 30, 2018, 9:02 AM: "Given that another editor of my User: Conservative account unblocked him, I think he was hoping would be unblocked again. That is not going to happen."[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:50, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
::SamHB, did you notice that editor of the [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] used the term LGBTQ. Personally, I think the Q is rather redundant so I am not a fan of this term. How often was the term LGBTQ used in other articles created by the User: Conservative account? Of course, this is yet another sign there is more than one editor of the User: Conservative account.
::And then there are the stylistic issues of: the quote box differences; the greater tendency to put footnotes in the middle of sentences; the multiple use of the word gay in the article which is a term I rarely use; the dependent clause "as such" used in the beginning of a sentence which I believe I have never done in any of my writings at Conservapedia and finally the multiple use of the word "régime" in the article/page (I may have used the term "regime" in my articles but I never spelled it "régime").
::SamHB, it's time to face that more than one editor has used the User: Conservative account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:30, 13 April 2019 (EDT)
== And accept there is more than one editor who uses the User: SamHB account ==
== And accept there is more than one editor who uses the User: SamHB account ==