Changes
→Lead: My edits are about errors not ideology
==Lead==
==Lead==
:[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] the reverts that you make contradict much of what is found later in the article. I have now added something to the lead re illegal immigration. Don't [[Fake news|falsify facts]] for the sake of propaganda. {{unsigned|Timber}}
:[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] the reverts that you make contradict much of what is found later in the article. I have now added something to the lead re illegal immigration. Don't [[Fake news|falsify facts]] for the sake of propaganda. {{unsigned|Timber}} I saw no place or instructions!
::You were blocked for editing with a liberal POV, and you are on the verge of another block. Most immigration today is for economic reasons, not educational or religious freedom -- the Pilgrims migrated at a time when any type of immigration was rare and usually was from a country to a colony controlled by that country. CP will not accept the propaganda or the falsification of facts, and that's why you're being reverted. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:24, 16 April 2019 (EDT)
::You were blocked for editing with a liberal POV, and you are on the verge of another block. Most immigration today is for economic reasons, not educational or religious freedom -- the Pilgrims migrated at a time when any type of immigration was rare and usually was from a country to a colony controlled by that country. CP will not accept the propaganda or the falsification of facts, and that's why you're being reverted. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:24, 16 April 2019 (EDT)
:::And where am I adding "personal opinion"? Specific examples? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:26, 16 April 2019 (EDT)
:::And where am I adding "personal opinion"? Specific examples? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:26, 16 April 2019 (EDT)
::::My objection is that your version of the lead does not summarize what is said below in the article. The following is a distortion of what the article actually says (it is your personal opinion): "from abandonment of their family there to an attempt to benefit from entitlements or opportunities in a new country," though the real problem is what you omit. Furthermore you ignore the usual definition of immigration. There are some parts of the article that also ignore this definition, and the fact that Columbus discovered America, and that this led to its subsequent [[Thirteen colonies|colonization]] by people (foreigners) from Europe. This is about a poorly written lead, not politics. {{unsigned|Timber}}
::::My objection is that your version of the lead does not summarize what is said below in the article. The following is a distortion of what the article actually says (it is your personal opinion): "from abandonment of their family there to an attempt to benefit from entitlements or opportunities in a new country," though the real problem is what you omit. Furthermore you ignore the usual definition of immigration. There are some parts of the article that also ignore this definition, and the fact that Columbus discovered America, and that this led to its subsequent [[Thirteen colonies|colonization]] by people (foreigners) from Europe. This is about a poorly written lead, not politics. {{unsigned|Timber}} '''There is no place to sign''' I presumed that your system was automatic!
:::::Abandonment isn't mentioned elsewhere. {{unsigned|Timber}}
:::::Abandonment isn't mentioned elsewhere. {{unsigned|Timber}} see above
::::::I made more changes -- your edit downplayed economic migration despite it being the most prominent form of migration today. Also, these aren't my personal opinions, and I didn't even write the original paragraph. One more revert from you -- and please keep in mind that you're a new editor, blocked once already, with an established liberal POV based on edits -- and you will receive a block. If you want to continue editing, you need to go to the talk page and refrain from undermining CP's established point of view. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:23, 16 April 2019 (EDT)
::::::I made more changes -- your edit downplayed economic migration despite it being the most prominent form of migration today. Also, these aren't my personal opinions, and I didn't even write the original paragraph. One more revert from you -- and please keep in mind that you're a new editor, blocked once already, with an established liberal POV based on edits -- and you will receive a block. If you want to continue editing, you need to go to the talk page and refrain from undermining CP's established point of view. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:23, 16 April 2019 (EDT)
I did emphasize economic factors and reduced the emphasis on atonement which isn't mentioned in the article. Furthermore I have used the Talk page and tried to produce compromise edits.
The following statement is eccentric at the least: "They moved inside the Empire and did not leave their native country for a foreign land, so they are not considered 'immigrants' any more than a person who moves from Florida to Alaska today". Again it sounds like one person's personal opinion, so that it's reasonable to ask for a source from a reputable historian. North America, was colonized by foreign immigrants. It is a fact, not false news or a liberal lie. CP's point of view is, I presume, that illegal immigration should end, but it surely also believes that the past history of immigration has to be based on facts not personal opinion–and that the dictionary definition of immigration is important. '''Timber'''
(username removed)