Changes

Trying to be positive here
Line 1: Line 1:  
You could spin off a [[Temptation]] article from this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:32, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
You could spin off a [[Temptation]] article from this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:32, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:Indeed.  I was surprised that the link was red. I was sure we'd have something on temptation by now. <font color="FF8700">[[User:Vossy|Vossy]]</font><sup><font color="CC0000">[[User_talk:Vossy|speak]]</font></sup> 16:34, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:Indeed.  I was surprised that the link was red. I was sure we'd have something on temptation by now. <font color="FF8700">[[User:Vossy|Vossy]]</font><sup><font color="CC0000">[[User_talk:Vossy|speak]]</font></sup> 16:34, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Trying to be positive here ==
 +
 +
But this is terrible. This article has zero-depth. And, frankly, do we need the paragraph at the bottom? I mean, honestly, why not just describe the act and the attraction to said act and move on? Why all this religious stuff about the wearing of clothes? [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:35, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
999

edits