Difference between revisions of "User talk:Learn together"
(→Natural Selection) |
|||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]] | [[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Good Job== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you for your excellent edits. Keep up the good work! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:09, 11 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:09, May 11, 2007
Hey there, Learn together. I noticed that you added a {{speedy template to Essay:Creationist Behavior on Conservapedia. I removed it, and as a courtesy, would like to let you know that nominating any article for deletion requires an explanation as to why you think it should be deleted (see Category:Speedy deletion candidates or Conservapedia:Articles for Deletion), and an AFD template certainly would have been more appropriate. Tagging established articles in the "Essay:" namespace without justification is frowned upon. And by the way, thanks for your contributions to Roman Empire! --Hojimachongtalk 20:18, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Note that Essay:Creationist Behavior on Conservapedia has the prefix "Essay:", noting that it is not an encyclopedia article, but rather an unofficial essay. And it was authorized as a response to Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia (yes, liberals are just as prolific as creationists here, and make most of the useful edits :P). --Hojimachongtalk 01:18, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Welcome!
Hello, Learn together, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Learn together!
Clinton Revert....
I jumped in since Dan was headed to bed, and tried to answer some of your questions, here: [[1]] --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 04:58, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- Sometimes it does seem as if they are instantly checked! It had me puzzled for a bit as well. What happens is, many regular users have a window opened here [[2]] to "Recent Changes" and refresh it periodically. Also, from your "Preferences" you can enable "Watch this Page" and set a limit even on how many. Then whatever page you edit, or manually choose to "watch" will show up in your Watch List. Since Dan had previously edited the Clinton page, it was on his, undoubtedly. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 14:15, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
Natural Selection
Why did you change the perfection and goal of natural selection paragraphs?
I made them pretty much POV-less, and I would like them to stay that way. I put them there because there seem to be a lot of misunderstandings about natural selection: natural selection does not need guidance or a goal (that doesn't mean there never has been guidance by outside sentient forces, it simply states that guidance or a goal are not necessary for natural selection, because it is a natural process.)
I'm going to edit it tomorrow, so if you wanna talk to me about it leave a message on my talk page.
The way it reads now is: either God guided natural selection, or God allowed it to proceed (while the goal of the paragraph was to point out that no such force is necessary)
-implying that no matter what, the Abrahamic God is there, and he's always watching.
Buddhists, Atheists or Hindu's cannot agree with this, even though they can agree on natural selection.
The way it used to read was: guidance is not necessary.
-implying that although guidance by God, Zeus, or Roswell Grey's for that matter, may have occurred, it is not necessary any of them had anything to do with it.
Everyone who agrees on natural selection can agree on this, even scientists.
I know, it does sounds strange to mention it does not require guidance, because it is as natural as breathing, but fact is, this part of natural selection is often misunderstood, so I added the paragraph as a pitfall prevention.
I think this version is ok.
Good Job
Thank you for your excellent edits. Keep up the good work! DanH 15:09, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
