Changes

The church historian [[Eusebius]], an Arian, offered the creed of his church, which did not address the questions in dispute, as a basis for agreement.  The bishop of Nicomaeda, also an Arian named Eusebius, put forward a defense of Arianism.  Arius himself was also heard and his points discussed; however, the overwhelming majority declared themselves in favor of the orthodox faith.  Using Eusebius's creed as a base, they wrote the [[Nicene Creed]] which specifically and in detail asserted the divinity of [[Jesus Christ]]: Used by Eusebius of Caesarea, hom'''oio'''usios means "of a similar substance". This is in contrast to the Nicene affirmation that Jesus and God the Father are hom'''oo'''usios, "of the same substance." <ref>[http://www.theopedia.com/homoiousios Theopedia: Homoiousios] The only difference in spelling between homoiousios and homoousios is the single Greek letter '''''iota''''' ( '''ι''' ). From this comes the expression "an iota of difference": ''There is not an iota of difference here. How can it make an iota of difference? I&nbsp;don't care an iota about this.'' However, the difference here is profound.</ref>  As expanded by the [[First Council of Constantinople]], this creed remains the unified statement of faith of the majority of Christians to this day.

The church historian [[Eusebius]], an Arian, offered the creed of his church, which did not address the questions in dispute, as a basis for agreement.  The bishop of Nicomaeda, also an Arian named Eusebius, put forward a defense of Arianism.  Arius himself was also heard and his points discussed; however, the overwhelming majority declared themselves in favor of the orthodox faith.  Using Eusebius's creed as a base, they wrote the [[Nicene Creed]] which specifically and in detail asserted the divinity of [[Jesus Christ]]: Used by Eusebius of Caesarea, hom'''oio'''usios means "of a similar substance". This is in contrast to the Nicene affirmation that Jesus and God the Father are hom'''oo'''usios, "of the same substance." <ref>[http://www.theopedia.com/homoiousios Theopedia: Homoiousios] The only difference in spelling between homoiousios and homoousios is the single Greek letter '''''iota''''' ( '''ι''' ). From this comes the expression "an iota of difference": ''There is not an iota of difference here. How can it make an iota of difference? I&nbsp;don't care an iota about this.'' However, the difference here is profound.</ref>  As expanded by the [[First Council of Constantinople]], this creed remains the unified statement of faith of the majority of Christians to this day.

The Council of Nicea also issued twenty canons concerning church order and discipline.  Modern skeptics such as [[Dan Brown]] have asserted that it also declared the official [[canon]] of the [[Bible]]; however, the main body of the canon (including all four [[Gospels]]) was already decided on long before the Council, and a few books only were still being discussed afterwards.<ref>[[Eusebius]] of Caesaria, ''History of the Church''</ref>

The Council of Nicea also issued twenty canons concerning church order and discipline.  Modern skeptics such as [[Dan Brown]] have asserted that it also declared the official [[canon]] of the [[Bible]]; however, the main body of the canon (including all four [[The Gospels|Gospels]]) was already decided on long before the Council, and a few books only were still being discussed afterwards.<ref>[[Eusebius]] of Caesaria, ''History of the Church''</ref>

The 20 Canons of the Council of Nicaea demonstrate absolutely no [[Syncretism|syncretistic]] compromise with pagan religion, as some have charged.<ref>See [http://www.christian-history.org/council-of-nicea-canons.html The Canons of the Council of Nicaea (christian-history.org)] ''The commentary by the author rejects and even condemns outright some of the canons as being Catholic, sinful, and opposed to the Bible, but most significantly he says nothing about any pagan religious beliefs being evident in any of them.''</ref> There is no evidence in any [[Exegesis|readings]] of the texts of the documents of the Council of Nicaea to support the charge that the emperor [[Constantine]] dictated to the council of bishops any change in doctrinal teaching or that he decreed or mandated any revision in any definition of Christian terms to accommodate any pagan beliefs, Roman or Greek or Babylonian.

The 20 Canons of the Council of Nicaea demonstrate absolutely no [[Syncretism|syncretistic]] compromise with pagan religion, as some have charged.<ref>See [http://www.christian-history.org/council-of-nicea-canons.html The Canons of the Council of Nicaea (christian-history.org)] ''The commentary by the author rejects and even condemns outright some of the canons as being Catholic, sinful, and opposed to the Bible, but most significantly he says nothing about any pagan religious beliefs being evident in any of them.''</ref> There is no evidence in any [[Exegesis|readings]] of the texts of the documents of the Council of Nicaea to support the charge that the emperor [[Constantine]] dictated to the council of bishops any change in doctrinal teaching or that he decreed or mandated any revision in any definition of Christian terms to accommodate any pagan beliefs, Roman or Greek or Babylonian.