Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − + + + +
no edit summary
On the other hand, it is not always ''anti-Science'' to question a particular scientific finding. Rather, it is the essence of the [[scientific method]] that every [[theory]] should be compared with the facts; if a theory makes predictions which do not occur, most scientists would agree that the theory should be discarded or at least modified (see [[Falsification]]).
On the other hand, it is not always ''anti-Science'' to question a particular scientific finding. Rather, it is the essence of the [[scientific method]] that every [[theory]] should be compared with the facts; if a theory makes predictions which do not occur, most scientists would agree that the theory should be discarded or at least modified (see [[Falsification]]).
A theory which cannot be tested, or which its proponents refuse to submit to testing, would be considered [[pseudoscience]] (or [[junk science]]).
A theory that cannot be tested, or which its proponents refuse to submit to testing, would be considered [[pseudoscience]] (or [[junk science]]).
==See also==
*[[War on Science]]
[[Category:Science]]
[[Category:Science]]