Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mockery"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
How can you honestly have this statement in here "Liberals always do this, so as to distract people from seeing the real facts." Liberals ALWAYS do this? I think this is taking things a step past conservative bias. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 12:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | How can you honestly have this statement in here "Liberals always do this, so as to distract people from seeing the real facts." Liberals ALWAYS do this? I think this is taking things a step past conservative bias. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 12:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :That is a pretty broad and bold statement to make. I'm sure there's a conservative or two out there that has mocked someone before too, should we include that as well? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:38, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:38, May 14, 2007
Shouldn't the personal comments be removed, or at least rephrased? The word "I" does not really belong in an encyclopedia article. By the way, conservatives use mockery, too. And wouldn't a good case example be the Emporer's New Clothes (where mockery would have exposed his vanity)? Human 14:25, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- Good point, mockery isn't always evil. Swift satirized the established church with his egg-shaped island, and his Modest Proposal is, well, a sort of "poster child" of mockery (see Satire). --Ed Poor 14:29, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
How can you honestly have this statement in here "Liberals always do this, so as to distract people from seeing the real facts." Liberals ALWAYS do this? I think this is taking things a step past conservative bias. --Colest 12:23, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
- That is a pretty broad and bold statement to make. I'm sure there's a conservative or two out there that has mocked someone before too, should we include that as well? Jrssr5 14:38, 14 May 2007 (EDT)