Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
57,799
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − + +
no edit summary
[[Nina Totenberg]] of ''All Things Considered'' reported the substance of an illegal [[leak]] on the program when information from Supreme Court Justice [[Clarence Thomas]]'s security clearance in violation of Senate Rules were passed to her by members of [[Senator Paul Simon]]'s staff, intending to defame Justice Thomas.<ref>[http://backissues.cjrarchives.org/year/92/1/thomas.asp The Clarence Thomas Hearings], by William Boot, ''Columbia Journalism Review'', January/February 1992.</ref>
[[Nina Totenberg]] of ''All Things Considered'' reported the substance of an illegal [[leak]] on the program when information from Supreme Court Justice [[Clarence Thomas]]'s security clearance in violation of Senate Rules were passed to her by members of [[Senator Paul Simon]]'s staff, intending to defame Justice Thomas.<ref>[http://backissues.cjrarchives.org/year/92/1/thomas.asp The Clarence Thomas Hearings], by William Boot, ''Columbia Journalism Review'', January/February 1992.</ref>
[[Ed Cullen]], a former features writer for ''The Baton Rouge Advocate,'' has contributed human interest essays to ''All Things Considered.''
[[Ed Cullen]], a former features writer for ''The Baton Rouge Advocate,'' has contributed human interest essays to ''All Things Considered.''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/people/4486994/ed-cullen|title=Ed Cullen: NPR|publisher-National Public Radio|isbn=1-59186-249-3|accessdate=January 4, 2020}}</ref>
'
==References==
==References==