Changes

274 bytes added ,  06:55, June 9, 2020
Line 150: Line 150:     
:That he wasn't in the scientific mainstream is irrelevant to his motives; I only asserted he was a leading flat-earther. Prominent flat-earthers--such as Rowbotham, Lady Blount and Charles K Johnson--all based their views on interpretations of the Bible. There's no shortage of Bible verses that refer to the earth being immovable; there are also several references to a firmament and the "four corners of the Earth". This model was the general consensus prior to the ancient Greeks, who correctly deduced the sphericity of the earth. It's simply disingenuous to say that the flat-earth movement (or at least a section of it) never had religious motives.[[User:Paulb|Paulb]] ([[User talk:Paulb|talk]]) 08:22, 17 October 2015 (EDT)
 
:That he wasn't in the scientific mainstream is irrelevant to his motives; I only asserted he was a leading flat-earther. Prominent flat-earthers--such as Rowbotham, Lady Blount and Charles K Johnson--all based their views on interpretations of the Bible. There's no shortage of Bible verses that refer to the earth being immovable; there are also several references to a firmament and the "four corners of the Earth". This model was the general consensus prior to the ancient Greeks, who correctly deduced the sphericity of the earth. It's simply disingenuous to say that the flat-earth movement (or at least a section of it) never had religious motives.[[User:Paulb|Paulb]] ([[User talk:Paulb|talk]]) 08:22, 17 October 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Is the Flat Earth theory liberal? ==
 +
 +
Conservapedia calls the theory liberal, and Liberalpedia calls it conservative. Personally, I think that most Flat Earthers look, sound and act like your typical right wingers. Or maybe we should just keep politics out of this one?
SkipCaptcha
571

edits