Difference between revisions of "Monkey"
From Conservapedia
JohnLambert (Talk | contribs) m (I stated that creationist positions on human-monkey relations is justified by a lack of transitional fossils) |
(Heh) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Image:Olive baboon.jpg|thumb|right|300px|An Olive baboon, a kind of monkey]] | + | [[Image:Olive baboon.jpg|thumb|right|300px|An Olive baboon, a kind of monkey. Scientists now consider this species more intelligent than the current President of the United States]] |
A '''monkey''' is a [[polypheletic]] classification of any long tailed [[primate]] that is not a [[prosimian]]. Varieties of them can be found in [[South America]], [[Africa]] and [[Asia]]. [[Evolutionists]] believe that [[humans]] and monkeys, like all species, share a common ancestor, which is disputed by more accurate [[creation scientists]]. A lack of transitional fossils between apes and humans supports the creationist side. | A '''monkey''' is a [[polypheletic]] classification of any long tailed [[primate]] that is not a [[prosimian]]. Varieties of them can be found in [[South America]], [[Africa]] and [[Asia]]. [[Evolutionists]] believe that [[humans]] and monkeys, like all species, share a common ancestor, which is disputed by more accurate [[creation scientists]]. A lack of transitional fossils between apes and humans supports the creationist side. | ||
[[Category:Primates]] | [[Category:Primates]] | ||
Revision as of 01:08, August 28, 2020
A monkey is a polypheletic classification of any long tailed primate that is not a prosimian. Varieties of them can be found in South America, Africa and Asia. Evolutionists believe that humans and monkeys, like all species, share a common ancestor, which is disputed by more accurate creation scientists. A lack of transitional fossils between apes and humans supports the creationist side.
