Changes

::I haven't a clue what you're talking about. All I know is you disrupted my talking points in the mainspace before they were completed. In several sections they never were completed. Unlike yourself, I didn't cut n paste my Protagonist position, but I did take the bait with the loaded Debate question. It appears you're not happy with the Protagonist position. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 15:37, 30 August 2020 (EDT)

::I haven't a clue what you're talking about. All I know is you disrupted my talking points in the mainspace before they were completed. In several sections they never were completed. Unlike yourself, I didn't cut n paste my Protagonist position, but I did take the bait with the loaded Debate question. It appears you're not happy with the Protagonist position. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 15:37, 30 August 2020 (EDT)

:::YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE. Right. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 15:38, 30 August 2020 (EDT)<br>I just now heard Dataclarifier (Michael) laugh behind me. He read what I posted here.<br>"'''Disrupted my talking points'''"!!! Poor baby! I've seen what you did to Dataclarifier's own talking points in disrupting his talking points argument so much that to make it without disruption and make sense he had to copy it to an Essay page. Talk page Infant baptism. You couldn't stand to let him make his point. ''And you yourself disrupted it without posting below his signature line.'' '''You hypocrite!''' Well, when it turned out to be your turn in accordance with the precedent you set, ''you hated it''. Conservative even had to tell you not to do that. You did it any way. Why does Andy put up with you? You constantly violate Conservapedia rules and ethics and commandments. The [[Logical Fallacy#Special pleading|fallacy of special pleading]]. [[Double standard]]!! You're no Christian. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 15:53, 30 August 2020 (EDT)

:::YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE. Right. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 15:38, 30 August 2020 (EDT)<br>I just now heard Dataclarifier (Michael) laugh behind me. He read what I posted here.<br>"'''Disrupted my talking points'''"!!! Poor baby! I've seen what you did to Dataclarifier's own talking points in disrupting his talking points argument so much that to make it without disruption and make sense he had to copy it to an Essay page. Talk page Infant baptism. You couldn't stand to let him make his point. ''And you yourself disrupted it without posting below his signature line.'' '''You hypocrite!''' Well, when it turned out to be your turn in accordance with the precedent you set, ''you hated it''. Conservative even had to tell you not to do that. You did it any way. Why does Andy put up with you? You constantly violate Conservapedia rules and ethics and commandments. The [[Logical Fallacy#Special pleading|fallacy of special pleading]]. [[Double standard]]!! You're no Christian. --[[User:IndependentSkeptic|IndependentSkeptic]] ([[User talk:IndependentSkeptic|talk]]) 15:53, 30 August 2020 (EDT)

::::You know, everyone said this was a foolish Debate to get involved with. I did it anyway, with no regrets. Obviously we never even got into all the spam Debate texts in the Debate question. But I did just now read over all your objections above. It appears you got your butt handed to you on a popsicle stick.  

::::You know, everyone said this was a foolish Debate to get involved with. I did it anyway, with no regrets. Obviously we never even got into all the spam Debate texts in the Debate question. But I did just now read over all your objections above. It appears you got your butt handed to you on a popsicle stick.  

::::Let's call this Debate over, and move onto either Holy Spirit baptism or Martin Luther (sorry, I can't participate as an editor in a Luther debate cause I just don't really know much about it).  No sense going over Catholic doctrine on baptism, cause that's been covered on several pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 16:08, 30 August 2020 (EDT)

::::Let's call this Debate over, and move onto either Holy Spirit baptism or Martin Luther (sorry, I can't participate as an editor in a Luther debate cause I just don't really know much about it).  No sense going over Catholic doctrine on baptism, cause that's been covered on several pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]} 16:08, 30 August 2020 (EDT)