Changes

no edit summary
Line 89: Line 89:     
I appreciate this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&diff=170855&oldid=166181 edit], and concur.  While I also neglect make edit summaries, I want to encourage you to make use of the edit summary box.  This probably sounds like the pot calling the kettle black, but I assure you that I do endeavor to follow this advice, and I encourage you to do the same.  It makes reviewing edit histories of articles easier.  Thanks for contributing.  [[User:HeartOfGold|<big>H</big><small>eart</small><big>O</big><small>f</small><big>G</big><small>old</small>]][[User_talk:HeartOfGold|<sub><small>talk</small></sub>]] 01:22, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I appreciate this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&diff=170855&oldid=166181 edit], and concur.  While I also neglect make edit summaries, I want to encourage you to make use of the edit summary box.  This probably sounds like the pot calling the kettle black, but I assure you that I do endeavor to follow this advice, and I encourage you to do the same.  It makes reviewing edit histories of articles easier.  Thanks for contributing.  [[User:HeartOfGold|<big>H</big><small>eart</small><big>O</big><small>f</small><big>G</big><small>old</small>]][[User_talk:HeartOfGold|<sub><small>talk</small></sub>]] 01:22, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Compliment ==
 +
Excellent work on the Rather article.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 12:58, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
5,274

edits