Some ancients expressed '''<big><math>\pi</math></big>''' by using fractional approximations. The Rhind, or Ahmes Papyrus (''c.'' 1650 B.C.)<ref>http://www.math.buffalo.edu/mad/Ancient-Africa/mad_ancient_egyptpapyrus.html</ref><ref>https://www.math.tamu.edu/~don.allen/history/egypt/node3.html</ref> has shown that the [[ancient Egypt]]ians had determined the value for '''<big><math>\pi</math></big>''' to be 3.1605. The [[Babylonia]]n value from the same era was 3 1/8 = 3.125.<ref>Boyer, ''A History of Mathematics'', 2nd edition</ref>, coming to within 1 percent accuracy for both<ref>https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/mathematical-treasure-old-babylonian-area-calculation</ref>. | Some ancients expressed '''<big><math>\pi</math></big>''' by using fractional approximations. The Rhind, or Ahmes Papyrus (''c.'' 1650 B.C.)<ref>http://www.math.buffalo.edu/mad/Ancient-Africa/mad_ancient_egyptpapyrus.html</ref><ref>https://www.math.tamu.edu/~don.allen/history/egypt/node3.html</ref> has shown that the [[ancient Egypt]]ians had determined the value for '''<big><math>\pi</math></big>''' to be 3.1605. The [[Babylonia]]n value from the same era was 3 1/8 = 3.125.<ref>Boyer, ''A History of Mathematics'', 2nd edition</ref>, coming to within 1 percent accuracy for both<ref>https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/mathematical-treasure-old-babylonian-area-calculation</ref>. |