Changes

Talk:Pi (view source)

Revision as of 01:30, July 31, 2021

489 bytes added , 01:30, July 31, 2021

Line 189: Line 189:

Yours statement is like saying that as 1, 11, 111, 1111, 11.111, 111.111 and so on are natural numbers, an infinite string of 1s is a natural number, too: And I hope we can agree that this is a false statement.

--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 17:41, July 30, 2021 (EDT)

+

:Your superb examples demonstrate that if true for "n" significant digits, then one can be found later having "n+1" significant digits. This reinforces the proof by induction. I don't see any support for your assertion "that is impossible." I also don't see any connection to your hypothesis about whether an infinite string of 1s is a "natural number," which is simply a matter of definition.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:30, July 30, 2021 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,445

edits