Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hugo Chavez"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
 
:Chavez does not have a record of increasing his power, merely changing the economy to having a socialist slant. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:21, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:Chavez does not have a record of increasing his power, merely changing the economy to having a socialist slant. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:21, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::*actually, he does [http://www.mywire.com/pubs/ForeignPolicy/2006/01/01/1111144/print].  Chavez is an autocrat.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 21:28, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::*actually, he does [http://www.mywire.com/pubs/ForeignPolicy/2006/01/01/1111144/print].  Chavez is an autocrat.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] <sup>[[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]]</sup> 21:28, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
I used to have neighbors from Venezuela whose relatives were on Chavez's hit list. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 21:28, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:28, May 31, 2007

This page appears fine to me. Citations are needed throughout the article, but as far as everything else goes, I approve. ColinR 05:18, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks

I'll get to work on some citations, but thankyou for accepting it, It's good to see some objectivity on this site. =)

This article is surprisingly neutral

I'm impressed that this article is surprisingly neutral towards Chavez, I figured it would call him a totalitarian communist.--DemocraticSocialist 11:50, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

He's more of a greedy communist robber baron. RobS 16:36, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

It must be liberal subversion hahahaha--DemocraticSocialist 11:51, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

Sorry to burst the bubble. He has been referred to as a dictator here. Have patience this article will eventually follow suit. Auld Nick 11:59, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

I knew it was too good to be true. While Castro is a dictator, Chavez who was elected by almost two thirds of the population is clearly not --DemocraticSocialist 14:58, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

We're waiting for Castro to die before her passes the baton. RobS 16:27, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

Dictator!!!!????

How can someone who is democratically elected be referred to as a dictator --ScandalousHegemony 23:57, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

How about that Hitler guy in 1933? Karajou 21:16, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
...Who was not democratically elected. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 21:17, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

It doesn't matter how he got into power, especially if he significantly increases his power while in office. DanH 21:19, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Chavez does not have a record of increasing his power, merely changing the economy to having a socialist slant. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 21:21, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

I used to have neighbors from Venezuela whose relatives were on Chavez's hit list. DanH 21:28, 30 May 2007 (EDT)