Difference between revisions of "Mar-a-Lago raid litigation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
*Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Nat’l Archives & Recs. Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012) | *Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Nat’l Archives & Recs. Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012) | ||
*King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 562 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 2009) | *King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 562 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 2009) | ||
| − | *Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., | + | *Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., 101 F.3d 863 (2d Cir. 1996) |
| − | 101 F.3d 863 (2d Cir. 1996) | + | *La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 352 U.S. 249 (1957) |
| − | *La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., | + | *Lyons v. PNC Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 26 F.4th 180 (4th Cir. 2022) (repeatedly cited) |
| − | 352 U.S. 249 (1957) | + | *Macri v. U.S. ex. rel. John H. Maxwell & Co., 353 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1965) |
| − | *Lyons v. PNC Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, | + | *McFarlin v. Conseco Servs., LLC, 381 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2004) |
| − | 26 F.4th 180 (4th Cir. 2022) (repeatedly cited) | + | *Microsoft Corp. v. Baker, 137 S. Ct. 1702 (2017) |
| − | *Macri v. U.S. ex. rel. John H. Maxwell & Co., | + | *Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009) (repeatedly cited) |
| − | 353 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1965) | + | *Moore v. City of Wynnewood, 57 F.3d 924 (10th Cir. 1995) |
| − | *McFarlin v. Conseco Servs., LLC, | + | *Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988) |
| − | 381 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2004) | + | *Myers v. Hertz Corp., 624 F.3d 537 (2d Cir. 2010) |
| − | *Microsoft Corp. v. Baker, | + | *Nat’l Org. for the Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Mullen, 828 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1987) |
| − | 137 S. Ct. 1702 (2017) | + | *Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009) |
| − | *Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, | + | *O’Hanlon v. Uber Techs., Inc., 990 F.3d 757 (3d Cir. 2021) |
| − | 558 U.S. 100 (2009) (repeatedly cited) | + | *Pickett v. Texas Tech Univ. Health Scis. Ctr., 37 F.4th 1013 (5th Cir. 2022) |
| − | *Moore v. City of Wynnewood, | + | *Police Ass’n of New Orleans ex rel. Cannatella v. New Orleans, 100 F.3d 1159 (5th Cir. 1996) |
| − | 57 F.3d 924 (10th Cir. 1995) | + | *Price v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 389 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2004) |
| − | *Morrison v. Olson, | + | *Puente Arizona v. Arpaio, 821 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2016) |
| − | 487 U.S. 654 (1988) | + | *Reid v. Doe Run Res. Corp., 701 F.3d 840 (8th Cir. 2012) (repeatedly cited) |
| − | *Myers v. Hertz Corp., | + | *Reynolds v. McInnes, 380 F.3d 1303, fn. 3 (11th Cir. 2004) |
| − | 624 F.3d 537 (2d Cir. 2010) | + | *Rux v. Republic of Sudan, 461 F.3d 461 (4th Cir. 2006) |
| − | *Nat’l Org. for the Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Mullen, | + | *Shakman v. Clerk of Cook Cnty., 994 F.3d 832 (7th Cir. 2021) |
| − | 828 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1987) | + | *Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244 (1992) |
| − | *Nken v. Holder, | + | *Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35 (1995) (repeatedly cited) |
| − | 556 U.S. 418 (2009) | + | *Switz. Cheese Ass’n, Inc. v. E. Horne’s Mkt., Inc., 385 U.S. 23 (1966) |
| − | *O’Hanlon v. Uber Techs., Inc., | + | *Thompson v. Enomoto, 815 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1987) |
| − | 990 F.3d 757 (3d Cir. 2021) | + | *Thornburgh v. Am. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 476 U.S. 747 (1986) |
| − | *Pickett v. Texas Tech Univ. Health Scis. Ctr., | ||
| − | 37 F.4th 1013 (5th Cir. 2022) | ||
| − | *Police Ass’n of New Orleans ex rel. Cannatella v. New Orleans, | ||
| − | 100 F.3d 1159 (5th Cir. 1996) | ||
| − | *Price v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, | ||
| − | 389 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2004) | ||
| − | *Puente Arizona v. Arpaio, | ||
| − | 821 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2016) | ||
| − | *Reid v. Doe Run Res. Corp., | ||
| − | 701 F.3d 840 (8th Cir. 2012) (repeatedly cited) | ||
| − | *Reynolds v. McInnes, | ||
| − | 380 F.3d 1303, fn. 3 (11th Cir. 2004) | ||
| − | *Rux v. Republic of Sudan, | ||
| − | 461 F.3d 461 (4th Cir. 2006) | ||
| − | *Shakman v. Clerk of Cook Cnty., | ||
| − | 994 F.3d 832 (7th Cir. 2021) | ||
| − | *Smith v. Barry, | ||
| − | 502 U.S. 244 (1992) | ||
| − | *Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm’n, | ||
| − | 514 U.S. 35 (1995) (repeatedly cited) | ||
| − | *Switz. Cheese Ass’n, Inc. v. E. Horne’s Mkt., Inc., | ||
| − | 385 U.S. 23 (1966) | ||
| − | *Thompson v. Enomoto, | ||
| − | 815 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1987) | ||
| − | *Thornburgh v. Am. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, | ||
| − | 476 U.S. 747 (1986) | ||
*Trump v. United States of America, No. 9:22cv-81294-AMC at ECF No. 64, 2022 WL 4015755 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 5, 2022) | *Trump v. United States of America, No. 9:22cv-81294-AMC at ECF No. 64, 2022 WL 4015755 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 5, 2022) | ||
*Trump v. United States, No. 22-13005, 2022 WL 4366684 (11th Cir. Sept. 21, 2022) (repeatedly cited) | *Trump v. United States, No. 22-13005, 2022 WL 4366684 (11th Cir. Sept. 21, 2022) (repeatedly cited) | ||
*United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) | *United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) | ||
*United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1990) | *United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1990) | ||
| − | *United States v. Samueli, | + | *United States v. Samueli, 582 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2009) |
| − | 582 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2009) | + | *Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. V. U.S. ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (2000) |
| − | *Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. V. U.S. ex rel. Stevens, | + | *W. Airlines, Inc. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 480 U.S. 1301 |
| − | 529 U.S. 765 (2000) | + | *Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, 13 F.4th 434 (5th Cir. 2021) |
| − | *W. Airlines, Inc. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, | + | *Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, 516 U.S. 199 (1996) |
| − | 480 U.S. 1301 | ||
| − | *Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, | ||
| − | 13 F.4th 434 (5th Cir. 2021) | ||
| − | *Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, | ||
| − | 516 U.S. 199 (1996) | ||
== Statutes cited== | == Statutes cited== | ||
Revision as of 22:40, October 4, 2022
Mar-a-Lago raid litigation included an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court filed by Donald Trump on October 4.[1] The application cites 69 precedents in favor of overruling the Eleventh Circuit decision that stayed a good district court ruling:
Arguments made
- that the Eleventh Circuit lacked jurisdiction to stay the special master order concerning review of classified documents
- that the district court did not abuse its authority to allow the special master to review the classified documents
Precedents cited
A total of 69 decisions are cited in Trump's application:
- Abelesz v. Erste Grp. Bank AG, 695 F.3d 655 (7th Cir. 2012)
- Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651 (1977)
- Al Odah v. United States, 559 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (repeatedly cited)
- Alabama v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 424 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir. 2005) (repeatedly cited)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
- Baltimore Contractors v. Bodinger, 348 U.S. 176 (1955)
- Bogard v. Wright, 159 F.3d 1060 (7th Cir. 1998)
- Bogosian v. Woloohojian Realty Corp., 923 F.2d 898 (1st Cir. 1991)
- BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 141 S. Ct. 1532 (2021)
- Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886 (1961)
- Carpenter v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 541 F.3d 1048 (11th Cir. 2008)
- Carson v. Am. Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79 (1981)
- Certain Named & Unnamed Non-Citizen Child. & Their Parents v. Texas, 448 U.S. 1327 (1980)
- Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)
- Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949)
- Coleman v. Paccar, Inc., 424 U.S. 1301 (1976)
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. Stidham, 640 F.3d 1140 (10th Cir. 2011) (repeatedly cited)
- Deckert v. Indep. Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282 (1940)
- Dep’t of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988)
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc., 511 U.S. 863 (1994)
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368 (1981)
- Gardner v. Westinghouse Broad. Co., 437 U.S. 478 (1978)
- Gary W. v. Louisiana, 601 F.2d 240 (5th Cir. 1979)
- Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134 (2012)
- Grilli v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 78 F.3d 1533 (11th Cir.1996)
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271 (1988)
- Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006)
- Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183 (2010)
- I.A.M. Nat. Pension Fund Benefit Plan A v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 789 F.2d 21 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
- In re Deepwater Horizon, 793 F.3d 479 (5th Cir. 2015)
- Int’l Prod. Corp. v. Koons, 325 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1963)
- Jones v. Clinton, 72 F.3d 1354 (8th Cir. 1996)
- Jones v. Fransen, 857 F.3d 843 (11th Cir. 2017)
- Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Nat’l Archives & Recs. Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012)
- King v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 562 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 2009)
- Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., 101 F.3d 863 (2d Cir. 1996)
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 352 U.S. 249 (1957)
- Lyons v. PNC Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 26 F.4th 180 (4th Cir. 2022) (repeatedly cited)
- Macri v. U.S. ex. rel. John H. Maxwell & Co., 353 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1965)
- McFarlin v. Conseco Servs., LLC, 381 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2004)
- Microsoft Corp. v. Baker, 137 S. Ct. 1702 (2017)
- Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009) (repeatedly cited)
- Moore v. City of Wynnewood, 57 F.3d 924 (10th Cir. 1995)
- Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988)
- Myers v. Hertz Corp., 624 F.3d 537 (2d Cir. 2010)
- Nat’l Org. for the Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Mullen, 828 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1987)
- Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009)
- O’Hanlon v. Uber Techs., Inc., 990 F.3d 757 (3d Cir. 2021)
- Pickett v. Texas Tech Univ. Health Scis. Ctr., 37 F.4th 1013 (5th Cir. 2022)
- Police Ass’n of New Orleans ex rel. Cannatella v. New Orleans, 100 F.3d 1159 (5th Cir. 1996)
- Price v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 389 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2004)
- Puente Arizona v. Arpaio, 821 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2016)
- Reid v. Doe Run Res. Corp., 701 F.3d 840 (8th Cir. 2012) (repeatedly cited)
- Reynolds v. McInnes, 380 F.3d 1303, fn. 3 (11th Cir. 2004)
- Rux v. Republic of Sudan, 461 F.3d 461 (4th Cir. 2006)
- Shakman v. Clerk of Cook Cnty., 994 F.3d 832 (7th Cir. 2021)
- Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244 (1992)
- Swint v. Chambers Cnty. Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35 (1995) (repeatedly cited)
- Switz. Cheese Ass’n, Inc. v. E. Horne’s Mkt., Inc., 385 U.S. 23 (1966)
- Thompson v. Enomoto, 815 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1987)
- Thornburgh v. Am. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 476 U.S. 747 (1986)
- Trump v. United States of America, No. 9:22cv-81294-AMC at ECF No. 64, 2022 WL 4015755 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 5, 2022)
- Trump v. United States, No. 22-13005, 2022 WL 4366684 (11th Cir. Sept. 21, 2022) (repeatedly cited)
- United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)
- United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
- United States v. Samueli, 582 F.3d 988 (9th Cir. 2009)
- Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. V. U.S. ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (2000)
- W. Airlines, Inc. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 480 U.S. 1301
- Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson, 13 F.4th 434 (5th Cir. 2021)
- Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun, 516 U.S. 199 (1996)
Statutes cited
- U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2
- 18 U.S.C. § 793(e)
- 28 U.S.C. § 1291
- 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (and subparts)
- 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (and subparts)
- 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
- 44 U.S.C. § 2201 (and a subpart)
- 44 U.S.C. § 2203(b)
- 44 U.S.C. § 2203(f)(1)
- 44 U.S.C. § 2205(3)
- 50 U.S.C. § 3161
- 50 U.S.C. § 3163