Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,936
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − + − +
→Signs of cognitive disssonance in a person engaged in a discussion/argument
* Anti-police leftist rioters, [[Defund the police|who want to see police departments abolished based on perceived grievances]] (whether real or imaginary), suddenly demand police protection for themselves after they lose fights against pro-police patriots.
* Anti-police leftist rioters, [[Defund the police|who want to see police departments abolished based on perceived grievances]] (whether real or imaginary), suddenly demand police protection for themselves after they lose fights against pro-police patriots.
== Signs of cognitive discussion in a person engaged in a discussion/argument ==
== Signs of cognitive disssonance in a person engaged in a discussion/argument ==
Below are signs of cognitive discussion in a person engaged in a discussion/argument:
Below are signs of cognitive in a person engaged in a discussion/argument:
*The person is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments
*The person is unwilling to concede obvious factual points and arguments