Difference between revisions of "ESG"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*[[Essay: Democrats, Having Invented Ballot Harvesting, Are Now Into 401(k) Harvesting]] | *[[Essay: Democrats, Having Invented Ballot Harvesting, Are Now Into 401(k) Harvesting]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External links == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[https://hbr.org/2022/03/an-inconvenient-truth-about-esg-investing An Inconvenient Truth About ESG Investing], ''Harvard Business Review'', 2022 | ||
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[category:finance]] | [[category:finance]] | ||
[[category:politics]] | [[category:politics]] | ||
Revision as of 01:57, March 15, 2023
ESG refers to "environmental, social and governance," a phrase used by liberals in connection with investing in politically correct companies on the stock market.
Conservatives, including entire red states such as Florida, reject ESG investing. One commentator writes:
| “ | It has long been contended that environmental, social, and corporate governance scores (ESG) are the Left’s attempt to weaponize every non-leftist’s money against his personal beliefs and economic interests. This is patently true . . . to an extent.[1] | ” |
According to Elon Musk, the 'S' in 'ESG' stands for 'Satanic'.[2]
See also
External links
- An Inconvenient Truth About ESG Investing, Harvard Business Review, 2022