Changes

# An enjoyment and tolerance of deceit.  Liberal editors almost never criticized deceitful behavior as being "wrong".  Liberals generally reject the [[Ten Commandments]], and oppose teaching them to children.  Often liberal editors have defended or applauded deceitful behavior here.  This is remniscent of [[Wikipedia]] co-founder Jimmy Wales offering Essjay a position ''after'' his misrepresentations were disclosed, until public criticism compelled Wales to change his mind.

# An enjoyment and tolerance of deceit.  Liberal editors almost never criticized deceitful behavior as being "wrong".  Liberals generally reject the [[Ten Commandments]], and oppose teaching them to children.  Often liberal editors have defended or applauded deceitful behavior here.  This is remniscent of [[Wikipedia]] co-founder Jimmy Wales offering Essjay a position ''after'' his misrepresentations were disclosed, until public criticism compelled Wales to change his mind.

# A preference for obscenity.  Many liberal editors have complained about Commandment #3 in the [[rules]], which prohibits obscenity.  Frequently liberal editors have introduced obscenity into Conservapedia despite the rules, often leading to blocking accounts.  This is like Wikipedia's popular pages containing pornography, as described in [[Bias in Wikipedia]].

# A preference for obscenity.  Many liberal editors have complained about Commandment #3 in the [[rules]], which prohibits obscenity.  Frequently liberal editors have introduced obscenity into Conservapedia despite the rules, often leading to blocking accounts.  This is like Wikipedia's popular pages containing pornography, as described in [[Bias in Wikipedia]].

# A preference for complaining rather than submitting new entries.  Many liberal editors have complained 9 times more often than they have made a substantive addition, which violates the [[rule]] against 90% talk per 10% substantive edits.  In some cases this has even necessitated blocking accounts.

# A preference for complaining rather than submitting new entries.  Many liberal editors have complained 9 times more often than they have made a substantive addition, which violates the [[rule]] against 90% talk per 10% substantive edits.  In some cases this has even necessitated blocking accounts.

# Strident objections to the point in [[Bias in Wikipedia]] quantifying how Wikipedia is six times more liberal than the American public.  It is not that anyone (other than Jimmy Wales) attempts to deny that Wikipedia has a liberal bias.  Instead, liberal editors appear to object to ''quantifying'' it, particularly at a multiple of six.  But why isn't that claim flattering to them?  Conservatives would not object to a claim that they are __ times more conservative than such-and-such.  Perhaps assigning a number to the bias makes it difficult for liberals to deny it exists.

# Strident objections to the point in [[Bias in Wikipedia]] quantifying how Wikipedia is six times more liberal than the American public.  It is not that anyone (other than Jimmy Wales) attempts to deny that Wikipedia has a liberal bias.  Instead, liberal editors appear to object to ''quantifying'' it, particularly at a multiple of six.  But why isn't that claim flattering to them?  Conservatives would not object to a claim that they are __ times more conservative than such-and-such.  Perhaps assigning a number to the bias makes it difficult for liberals to deny it exists.