Difference between revisions of "Data: Why suspicious jab"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Opinion poll data sample, marginally biased.)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
== <big>"Why suspicious jab"</big> ==
+
== <big>"Why suspicious jab" -- Sample of opinions</big> ==
  
 
=== Unsatisfied by advice from others ===
 
=== Unsatisfied by advice from others ===

Revision as of 00:47, February 6, 2024

"Why suspicious jab" -- Sample of opinions

Unsatisfied by advice from others

  • Last month a double-jabbed friend who got Covid from his double-jabbed wife (one gave Covid to their double-jabbed son) urged me to have jabs. Last week a triple-vaxxed friend whose entire triple-jabbed family got Covid gave the same advice, which I politely, responsibly, ignore. , 2022 https://x.com/CliffEdge19/status/1481724106416566280?s=20

Underwhelmed by Government's conflicts of interest for sources of info on jab safety

Reports of On-field heart problems

Scam-factor

  • On the last day they even offered me 500 dollars to stay and take the vaccine. That just made me even more hella suspicious. And confirmed my decision to not take the jab. Why would any Corp give out 500 to take the jab? Also I'm not anti vaxx. I'm anti scams, 2021, https://x.com/cash_override/status/1459156130668679171?s=20

Forcing Jab

Already immune

High survivability

Population control, recent quotes, Boris Johnson