Changes

The National Academy of Science says,

The National Academy of Science says,

*"The fallibility of methods is a valuable reminder of the importance of [[skepticism]] in science. [[Scientific knowledge]] and [[scientific method]]s, whether old or new, must be continually scrutinized for possible errors. Such skepticism can conflict with other important features of science, such as the need for [[creativity]] and for conviction in arguing a given position. But organized and searching skepticism as well as an [[openness to new ideas]] are essential to guard against the intrusion of dogma or collective bias into scientific results."<ref>[http://www.john-daly.com/hockey/hockey.htm (John Daly website)]</ref>

*"The fallibility of methods is a valuable reminder of the importance of [[skepticism]] in science. [[Scientific knowledge]] and [[scientific method]]s, whether old or new, must be continually scrutinized for possible errors. Such skepticism can conflict with other important features of science, such as the need for [[creativity]] and for conviction in arguing a given position. But organized and searching skepticism as well as an [[Openness|openness to new ideas]] are essential to guard against the intrusion of dogma or collective bias into scientific results."<ref>[http://www.john-daly.com/hockey/hockey.htm (John Daly website)]</ref>

Fred Singer wrote:

Fred Singer wrote: