Changes

The OIC’s efforts to dominate global dialogues on security, religious freedom, and governance often come at the expense of countering extremist ideologies such as jihadism, which it has failed to fully confront within its ranks. Instead, the organization has been criticized for prioritizing the political and ideological agenda of certain Muslim-majority countries, sometimes even obstructing efforts to challenge the growing threat of jihadist extremism worldwide. Through its significant influence, the OIC seeks to sway international institutions like the [[UN]] and Human Rights org. toward policies that align with its members’ interests, making it a key player in shaping a global environment increasingly shaped by its ideological and political preferences.

The OIC’s efforts to dominate global dialogues on security, religious freedom, and governance often come at the expense of countering extremist ideologies such as jihadism, which it has failed to fully confront within its ranks. Instead, the organization has been criticized for prioritizing the political and ideological agenda of certain Muslim-majority countries, sometimes even obstructing efforts to challenge the growing threat of jihadist extremism worldwide. Through its significant influence, the OIC seeks to sway international institutions like the [[UN]] and Human Rights org. toward policies that align with its members’ interests, making it a key player in shaping a global environment increasingly shaped by its ideological and political preferences.

==Hypocrisy==

==Hypocrisy==