Changes

814 bytes removed ,  04:30, March 9, 2007
Line 5: Line 5:  
Although superficially similar to [[Intelligent Design]], Intelligent Design proponents have made clear that they are not the same thing, and in fact [[William Dembski]] has gone so far as to say that "As far as design theorists are concerned, theistic evolution is American evangelicalism's ill-conceived accommodation to Darwinism."<ref>''What every theologian should know about creation, evolution, and design'' Center for Interdisciplinary Studies Transactions 3(2), William Demsbki</ref>
 
Although superficially similar to [[Intelligent Design]], Intelligent Design proponents have made clear that they are not the same thing, and in fact [[William Dembski]] has gone so far as to say that "As far as design theorists are concerned, theistic evolution is American evangelicalism's ill-conceived accommodation to Darwinism."<ref>''What every theologian should know about creation, evolution, and design'' Center for Interdisciplinary Studies Transactions 3(2), William Demsbki</ref>
   −
== Criticisms of Theistic Evolution Position Expanded==
+
== Criticisms of Theistic Evolution Position From Evolutionists  ==
   −
Theistic evolution has recieved criticism from a variety of groups such as Young Earth Creationists, some Old Earth Creationists, agnostics and atheists. Young Earth Creationists have criticized theistic evolution for perceived compromise in regard to Biblical authority and interpretation. In their view, the Genesis account is a straightforward and/or literal narrative and any form of evolution is incompatible with the text and the view of theistic evolution creates a denial of central Bible teachings and/or creates other unnecessary theological problems. <ref>http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c015.html</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v11/i4/christian.asp</ref><ref>http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/1990</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v11/i4/christian.asp</ref>. In the other direction, proponents of theistic evolution have been accused of subtley undermining science piece by piece.<ref>http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2006/11/ed-brayton-speaks.html</ref>
+
In the other direction, proponents of theistic evolution have been accused of subtley undermining science piece by piece.<ref>http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/2006/11/ed-brayton-speaks.html</ref>
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,516

edits