SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,333
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − + +
Respect for Marriage Act (view source)
Revision as of 02:32, October 31, 2025
, 02:32, October 31, 2025no edit summary
The '''Respect for Marriage Act''' is an ironically-named, anti-family and unconstitutional act that would allow the [[United States Congress]] to further undermine [[traditional marriage]] (which had already been affected by the illegal ''[[Obergefell v. Hodges]]'' ruling of 2015 by the then-liberal dominated [[United States Supreme Court]]) by codifying [[same-sex "marriage"]] as "settled law" federally. The [[Democrat]]-majority House of Representatives voted for this act on July 19, 2022. All of the Democrats voted Yes for this act along with 47 Republicans. Surprisingly, [[Scott Perry]] and [[Kat Cammack]] voted for this act.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/now/heres-47-republicans-voted-marriage-214200413.html</ref>
The '''Respect for Marriage Act''' is an ironically-named, anti-family and unconstitutional act that would allow the [[United States Congress]] to further undermine [[traditional marriage]] (which had already been affected by the illegal ''[[Obergefell v. Hodges]]'' ruling of 2015 by the then-liberal dominated [[United States Supreme Court]]) by codifying [[same-sex "marriage"]] as "settled law" federally. The [[Democrat]]-majority House of Representatives voted for this act on July 19, 2022. All of the Democrats voted Yes for this act along with 47 Republicans. Surprisingly, [[Scott Perry]] and [[Kat Cammack]] voted for this act.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/now/heres-47-republicans-voted-marriage-214200413.html</ref>
Despite its name, the Respect for Marriage Act shows no respect for traditional marriage whatsoever by attempting to further give homosexuals [[special rights|special "rights"]] in attempting to make same-sex "marriage" "legal", even though there is no "right" to same-sex "marriage" to be found anywhere in the Constitution, a fact conveniently ignored by liberals who support the Act and the ''Obergefell'' decision.
Despite its name, the Respect for Marriage Act shows no respect for traditional marriage whatsoever by attempting to further give homosexuals [[special rights|special "rights"]] in attempting to make same-sex "marriage" "legal", even though there is no "right" to same-sex "marriage" to be found anywhere in the Constitution, a fact conveniently ignored by liberals who support the Act and the ''Obergefell'' decision.<br>
'''This law insures that same-sex marriages are recognized at the federal level,''' as long as the marriage ceremony occurs in a jurisdiction where same-sex marriages were legal at the time it was performed. It aims to protect the rights and benefits of these marriages across all states and US territories;<ref>https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/historic-victory-the-respect-for-marriage-act-is-law,/ref> in the event Obergefell v. Hodges is overturned. '''See Also'''[[Civil_marriage#Legal_Limitations | Marriage Legal_Limitations]]
==The 47 Republicans who voted for the Respect for Marriage Act==
==The 47 Republicans who voted for the Respect for Marriage Act==