Changes

646 bytes added ,  00:53, July 4, 2007
Line 284: Line 284:     
:::::I'd have a lot more confidence, however, in a citation from FDR's own papers, or Keynes' papers, or dual citations from sites devoted to their memories.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 20:40, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::I'd have a lot more confidence, however, in a citation from FDR's own papers, or Keynes' papers, or dual citations from sites devoted to their memories.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 20:40, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::Like I said, it's not a ''great'' source, but it is a source, and I'm not about to start thumbing through FDR's personal letters today. I think that demanding that level of primary source documentation would be a bit inconsistent with the content of this site as a whole, however, and also quite inconsistent with your standard for your own comments, such as your patent dismissal of anything printed in a certain major national publication. The fact is, I'm right, and I know it. If you don't want to put back my edits, then I'll just have to try contributing something else. [[User:Kristkrispies|Kristkrispies]] 20:53, 3 July 2007 (EDT)