Changes

'''Anthony's Study Aid'''

'''Anthony's Study Aid'''

:''With armies of Justinian like floods at the Pope’s command shall the true Christians (as well as those effectively protecting them) who refused the Papal mark and authority shall be broken (plucked up by the roots/genocided). Such as the destruction of the three ‘arian’ kingdoms: Odecer and his Heruli [493ad] at the hand of Theoderic, then the Vandals [534ad] and the Ostrogoths [538, 540ad] at the hand Belsarius after a flood of state legislated religious persecution under Justin [523ad] [524ad] and Justinian [533]. Meanwhile also crippling the Alamani [496ad], Burgundians [499ad] and Visigoths [507ad] by the hand of the Catholic Clovis. Even Theoderic’s prosperous Ostrogothic kingdom invited by the Bishops to invade Italy and uproot the Heruli which was contractually licensed by Emperor Zeno shall be targeted and uprooted.''

:Yet by the power of the armies, all who restrained or opposed the rising power of the bishops of Rome were uprooted<ref>Daniel 7:8<br>''"I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots..."''</ref> namely the Catholic Arian nations under [[Odoacer|Odoacer’s]] [[Heruli]] [493 AD], Germany’s [[Vandals]] in North Africa [534 AD], and even Theoderic’s Scandinavian [[Ostrogoths]] [536–540 AD] — whom the bishops themselves had invited into Italy to remove the Heruli, leading [[Theoderic the Great]] to make a covenant with Emperor [[Zeno]] commissioning his invasion of Italy. What a twist! The peoples they established in power, they then removed!

 

:Meanwhile also crippling the Alamani [496ad], Burgundians [499ad] and Visigoths [507ad] by the hand of the Catholic [[Clovis]].

:The contextual references to armies, overwhelming forces and the violent removal of power, leaders and treaties is inconsistent with the suggestion that this “prince of the covenant” is Jesus Christ.  The only grammatical conclusion is this ‘prince’ is a sovereign who has some kind of related contract relevant to the subject.

:The contextual references to armies, overwhelming forces and the violent removal of power, leaders and treaties is inconsistent with the suggestion that this “prince of the covenant” is Jesus Christ.  The only grammatical conclusion is this ‘prince’ is a sovereign who has some kind of related contract relevant to the subject.

:While the KJV reads closer to the Hebrew, the Septuagint reveals that they clearly understood what was written.

:While the KJV reads closer to the Hebrew, the Septuagint reveals that they clearly understood what was written.

=Daniel 11:23=

=Daniel 11:23=