Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Vandalism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I heard from Bethany that there was a major vandalism attack and that Philip Rayment locked the database. When I looked at the "reason" for database locking, I didn't see anything given. ...) |
(another mistake) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Let's find a better way to keep each other informed, so that no one ''accidentally'' unlocks the database when they shouldn't. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:54, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | Let's find a better way to keep each other informed, so that no one ''accidentally'' unlocks the database when they shouldn't. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:54, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :(Oops, I just found out that leaving the edit summary blank is ''not'' discreet! I have to put ''something'' in it, or else the software copies the beginning of whatever I post!! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:55, July 9, 2007
I heard from Bethany that there was a major vandalism attack and that Philip Rayment locked the database.
When I looked at the "reason" for database locking, I didn't see anything given. I just assumed it was a test, and that Philip got distracted and didn't unlock it after his test.
Let's find a better way to keep each other informed, so that no one accidentally unlocks the database when they shouldn't. --Ed Poor Talk 10:54, 9 July 2007 (EDT)