Changes

Line 350: Line 350:  
Adding to Aschflays useless comments which are unsubstantiated, why do you feel you need to change everything by creating a new deeply flawed with hundreds of thousands of grammer mistakes?  {{unsigned|Denzo}}
 
Adding to Aschflays useless comments which are unsubstantiated, why do you feel you need to change everything by creating a new deeply flawed with hundreds of thousands of grammer mistakes?  {{unsigned|Denzo}}
 
:I invite you to rewrite your comment in a less abusive manner and without the spelling and syntax mistakes of that sentence, let alone the unsubstantiated charges.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:43, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:I invite you to rewrite your comment in a less abusive manner and without the spelling and syntax mistakes of that sentence, let alone the unsubstantiated charges.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:43, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
My apologies, but what did I do wrong exactly? I'm dyslexic and to be honest I think a very good job of reaching a good level of grammer despite my limitations.
 +
 +
Also, speaking of 'Liberal bias' I am after seeing the Che Guevara article that he is a Liberal activist! There is such a thing of 'factual bias' trying to make something to suit your argument. Anyone with half a brain will recognise Che wasn't a Liberal. He was a socialist with close ties with the Chinese regime. This is but one example of the complete hypocrysy of this site and the entire ideology you represent. [[User:Denzo|Denzo]] 06:30, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
    
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==
 
== What if Wikipedia editors were to remove some instances of bias? ==
77

edits