Difference between revisions of "Retribution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(categorize)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Retribution was once a primary justification for criminal punishment.  In the exclusion of morality from schools and intellectual discourse, retribution is generally not taught in law school as a justification for criminal punishment.  It has been largely replaced by a [[utilitarian]] justification for criminal punishment, such as [[deterrence]] or rehabilitation.
 
Retribution was once a primary justification for criminal punishment.  In the exclusion of morality from schools and intellectual discourse, retribution is generally not taught in law school as a justification for criminal punishment.  It has been largely replaced by a [[utilitarian]] justification for criminal punishment, such as [[deterrence]] or rehabilitation.
 +
 +
[[category:crime]]

Revision as of 21:30, July 30, 2007

Retribution is just punishment for a sin or a crime.

Retribution was once a primary justification for criminal punishment. In the exclusion of morality from schools and intellectual discourse, retribution is generally not taught in law school as a justification for criminal punishment. It has been largely replaced by a utilitarian justification for criminal punishment, such as deterrence or rehabilitation.