Difference between revisions of "Talk:Johannes Kepler"
From Conservapedia
m |
BillOhannity (Talk | contribs) (section for kepler's 3 laws?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this a good place to mention [[conic section]]s? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:22, 4 April 2007 (EDT) | Is this a good place to mention [[conic section]]s? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:22, 4 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == section for kepler's 3 laws? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm thinking it might be a good idea to give the 3 laws their own section and to list all of them: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. The sun is at a focus of the ellipse of each planet's orbit. | ||
| + | 2. The law of equal areas in equal times. | ||
| + | 3. The cubed squared law. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I just think it would be good to give a little more face-time to Kepler's most famous (and most important) work. Any thoughts? --[[User:BillOhannity|BillOhannity]] 22:27, 7 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:27, August 8, 2007
Is this a good place to mention conic sections? --Ed Poor 14:22, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
section for kepler's 3 laws?
I'm thinking it might be a good idea to give the 3 laws their own section and to list all of them:
1. The sun is at a focus of the ellipse of each planet's orbit. 2. The law of equal areas in equal times. 3. The cubed squared law.
I just think it would be good to give a little more face-time to Kepler's most famous (and most important) work. Any thoughts? --BillOhannity 22:27, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
