Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Ships"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Plagiarism?)
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Is it really OK that the articles on individual ships are, as far as I can tell, copied word for word from the given source?  Shouldn't they at least mention that the articles are copied? [[User:Masterbratac|Masterbratac]] 17:51, 13 August 2007 (EDT)
 
Is it really OK that the articles on individual ships are, as far as I can tell, copied word for word from the given source?  Shouldn't they at least mention that the articles are copied? [[User:Masterbratac|Masterbratac]] 17:51, 13 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
:It does look like all of these are copied word-for-word, which is pretty blatant plagiarism.  Either they need to be totally rewritten or deleted. [[User:Overture|Overture]] 17:57, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 21:57, August 13, 2007

Plagiarism?

Is it really OK that the articles on individual ships are, as far as I can tell, copied word for word from the given source? Shouldn't they at least mention that the articles are copied? Masterbratac 17:51, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

It does look like all of these are copied word-for-word, which is pretty blatant plagiarism. Either they need to be totally rewritten or deleted. Overture 17:57, 13 August 2007 (EDT)