| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Strong atheism''' (sometimes referred to as "positive atheism") is the position that there is no [[God]] or [[other gods]], and that there is persuasive reason and/or evidence to support this conclusion. It stands in contrast to [[weak atheism]]. | + | '''Strong atheism''' (sometimes called "positive atheism") is atheism in which the believer claims he can prove there is no [[God]]. It is different from [[weak atheism]], in which the believer claims only that theists cannot prove their is a God, so the atheist is justified in not believing in God. |
| | | | |
| − | Arguments for strong atheism can be divided into the following categories:
| + | Strong atheists use three types of arguments: |
| − | * Semantic apologetics: Asserting that the concepts underlying theism (e.g. "God") are meaningless, such that theism is meaningless, and therefore untrue. | + | * '''Semantic apologetics''': Arguing that religious language is meaningless, and therefore beliefs based on that language are not justified; |
| − | * Incoherency apologetics: Asserting that the attributes of God are logically incoherent and/or self-contradictory, such that a God with those characteristics is a logical impossibility, and therefore untrue. | + | * '''Incoherency apologetics''': Arguing that religious concepts are self-contradictory, and therefore cannot possibly be true; |
| − | * Materialist apologists: Asserting that because materialism is inherent to the human experience and theism contradicts materialism, it is untrue. | + | * '''Materialist apologists''': Arguing that because religion contradicts science, science must reject religion; |
| | | | |
| | == Semantic apologetics == | | == Semantic apologetics == |