nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: − +
Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 19:34, August 27, 2007
, 19:34, August 27, 2007"no original research" is academically limiting
# We do not attempt to be neutral to all points of view. We are neutral to the facts. If a group is a terrorist group, then we use the label "terrorist" but Wikipedia will use the "neutral" term "militant".
# We do not attempt to be neutral to all points of view. We are neutral to the facts. If a group is a terrorist group, then we use the label "terrorist" but Wikipedia will use the "neutral" term "militant".
# We do not allow liberal censorship of conservative facts. Wikipedia editors who are far more liberal than the American public frequently censor factual information. Conservapedia does not censor any facts that comport with the basic [[rules]].
# We do not allow liberal censorship of conservative facts. Wikipedia editors who are far more liberal than the American public frequently censor factual information. Conservapedia does not censor any facts that comport with the basic [[rules]].
# We allow original, properly labeled works, while Wikipedia does not. This promotes a more intellectual atmosphere on Conservapedia.
# We allow original, properly labeled works, while Wikipedia does not. This promotes a more intellectual atmosphere on Conservapedia. On Wikipedia, observations based on personal experience and interviews have been dismissed as "original research". Here, we do not restrict research for articles in that manner.
# We respect users' control over their own talk pages as much as possible. Wikipedia treats users' own talk pages like government or public property, and it becomes a place for Wikipedia editors to bully users.
# We respect users' control over their own talk pages as much as possible. Wikipedia treats users' own talk pages like government or public property, and it becomes a place for Wikipedia editors to bully users.
# We do not encourage the insertion of distracting "stub templates" in entries. Wikipedia has numerous distracting templates on entries.
# We do not encourage the insertion of distracting "stub templates" in entries. Wikipedia has numerous distracting templates on entries.