| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| | | | |
| | I started learning [[PHP]] {{age in days|month1=5|day1=19|year1=2007}} days ago. | | I started learning [[PHP]] {{age in days|month1=5|day1=19|year1=2007}} days ago. |
| | + | |
| | + | |
| | + | {{Userboxtop}} |
| | + | {{User talk self}} |
| | + | {{Userboxbottom}} |
| | + | Q: Is this your personal blog, or what?! |
| | + | |
| | + | A: No, but it just so happens that nearly every word I type, link I create, article or template I start - gains instant and widespread acceptance. |
| | + | |
| | + | Q: Isn't that a bit arrogant? |
| | + | |
| | + | A: Okay, I guess you're right. Perhaps I should be more humble. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==Wikipedia and Conservapedia== |
| | + | |
| | + | There was a time when Wikipedia was a [[meritocracy]], and I rose rapidly through the ranks then. I got Jimbo to create the Mediation and Arbitration committees, so he wouldn't have to be the sheriff all the time. I became the first elected bureaucrat, and pioneered the system whereby admins could enforce rules without having to take everything before a committee. |
| | + | |
| | + | But I didn't see the [[anti-elitism]] creeping up and choking the life out of the place. [[Larry Sanger]] was right. |
| | + | |
| | + | My only worry about Conservapedia is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so. |
| | | | |
| | ==Recent ideas and/or articles== | | ==Recent ideas and/or articles== |
| Line 193: |
Line 213: |
| | #[[The Paradoxical Commandments]] | | #[[The Paradoxical Commandments]] |
| | #[[Carbon dioxide]] | | #[[Carbon dioxide]] |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Who do you think you are?==
| |
| − | {{Userboxtop}}
| |
| − | {{User talk self}}
| |
| − | {{Userboxbottom}}
| |
| − | Q: Is this your personal blog, or what?!
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A: No, but it just so happens that nearly every word I type, link I create, article or template I start - gains instant and widespread acceptance.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Q: Isn't that a bit arrogant?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A: Okay, I guess you're right. Perhaps I should be more humble.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Explanations==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | There was a time when Wikipedia was a [[meritocracy]], and I rose rapidly through the ranks then. I got Jimbo to create the Mediation and Arbitration committees, so he wouldn't have to be the sheriff all the time. I became the first elected bureaucrat, and pioneered the system whereby admins could enforce rules without having to take everything before a committee.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | But I didn't see the [[anti-elitism]] creeping up and choking the life out of the place. [[Larry Sanger]] was right.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | My only worry about Conservapedia is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.
| |