Difference between revisions of "Line-item veto"
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) m (categorize) |
(Expanded, with example) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''line-item veto''' is the power of the top executive in government, either the president or a state governor, to sign a budget into law while striking out (lining out) certain expense items that the executive disfavors. This is favored by [[conservatives]] to reduce overall spending, but the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held it to be unconstitutional at the [[federal]] level. Many state governors have this power. | The '''line-item veto''' is the power of the top executive in government, either the president or a state governor, to sign a budget into law while striking out (lining out) certain expense items that the executive disfavors. This is favored by [[conservatives]] to reduce overall spending, but the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held it to be unconstitutional at the [[federal]] level. Many state governors have this power. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Part of the controversy around the line item veto is in the [[separation of powers]] in government. The line item veto can be used to change the meaning of passages in a law. Vetoing a 'not' can drastically alter the meaning of a sentence. It has also been used to selectively veto letters and make new law - a power that should not be in the hands of the executive branch. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For example, the passage: | ||
| + | :"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." | ||
| + | Could be veoted | ||
| + | :"A <s>well regu</s>late<s>d</s> mil<s>itia, b</s>e<s>ing necessa</s>r<s>y to the security</s> of a free state, <s>the right of the people to keep and bear arms,</s> shall not be infringed." | ||
| + | Which would now read: | ||
| + | :"A late miler of a free state, shall not be infringed." | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Further reading == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://www.legis.state.wi.us/senate/sen10/news/FrankensteinVeto.pdf Frankenstein Veto - an example of Jim Doyle using line item veto on the Wisconsin budget] | ||
[[category:United States Government]] | [[category:United States Government]] | ||
Revision as of 22:19, September 15, 2007
The line-item veto is the power of the top executive in government, either the president or a state governor, to sign a budget into law while striking out (lining out) certain expense items that the executive disfavors. This is favored by conservatives to reduce overall spending, but the U.S. Supreme Court held it to be unconstitutional at the federal level. Many state governors have this power.
Part of the controversy around the line item veto is in the separation of powers in government. The line item veto can be used to change the meaning of passages in a law. Vetoing a 'not' can drastically alter the meaning of a sentence. It has also been used to selectively veto letters and make new law - a power that should not be in the hands of the executive branch.
For example, the passage:
- "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Could be veoted
- "A
well regulatedmilitia, being necessary to the securityof a free state,the right of the people to keep and bear arms,shall not be infringed."
Which would now read:
- "A late miler of a free state, shall not be infringed."