Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,714
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 01:30, September 17, 2007
, 01:30, September 17, 2007→Wikipedia has been called by some the National Enquirer of the internet?
*Nihiltres, merely repeating gossipy junk, no matter the source, isn't any excuse. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 18:50, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
*Nihiltres, merely repeating gossipy junk, no matter the source, isn't any excuse. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 18:50, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
== Wikipedia has been called by some the National Enquirer of the internet? ==
== Our Banner for the article is poor. Wikipedia has been called by some the National Enquirer of the internet? ==
Wikipedia has been called some the National Enquirer of the internet? Who is some? Please cite your sources! Please do not claim something without giving a source! It is better to not make a claim then make a unsourced claim! Who disagrees with me regarding the futility and undesirability of unsourced claims? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:28, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
Wikipedia has been called some the National Enquirer of the internet? Who is some? Please cite your sources! Please do not claim something without giving a source! It is better to not make a claim then make a unsourced claim! Who disagrees with me regarding the futility and undesirability of unsourced claims? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:28, 16 September 2007 (EDT)