614
edits
Changes
Talk:Universal common ancestry (view source)
Revision as of 14:35, September 19, 2007
, 14:35, September 19, 2007no edit summary
''Creationism vigorously rejects this idea, based on their belief that the scientific evidence makes universal common ancestry appear highly improbable or impossible.'' Some sourced examples of this ''scientific evidence'' would improve the article.
''Creationism vigorously rejects this idea, based on their belief that the scientific evidence makes universal common ancestry appear highly improbable or impossible.'' Some sourced examples of this ''scientific evidence'' would improve the article.
: on the way. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 10:35, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
''Universal common ancestry is an ancient idea'' Did ''pagans'' really believe ''that '''all life''' on Earth is related via a single family tree'' from a common ancestor?
''Universal common ancestry is an ancient idea'' Did ''pagans'' really believe ''that '''all life''' on Earth is related via a single family tree'' from a common ancestor?
:: the article doesn't say they did -- only CD with animals. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 10:35, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
The ''cars'' argument about ''common design characteristics'' makes creationists look silly. Life forms (species) reproduce themselves. Makes of car don't.
The ''cars'' argument about ''common design characteristics'' makes creationists look silly. Life forms (species) reproduce themselves. Makes of car don't.
: that doesn't affect the argument. The argument is "similarity does not imply common descent any more than common design." cars show that to be true. Just because things reproduce doesn't mean they're related either. [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]] 10:35, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
[[User:PhilMcAvity|PhilMcAvity]] 06:41, 19 September 2007 (EDT)
[[User:PhilMcAvity|PhilMcAvity]] 06:41, 19 September 2007 (EDT)